 |
|
|
|
Caroline Penn/Panos,
Kiribati
|
| |
Chapter 4 - summary
Pacific islands foretell future of climate
change
Scientists now describe climate change as
inevitable and Pacific islands are on the front
line. Conventional development risks fuelling vulnerability. So
future development decisions must be viewed through the lens of
risk reduction. Far more resources and political will are needed
to protect exposed coastal communities from the worst of the weather.
The latest reported data show that the number of people in the Oceania
region affected by weather-related disasters has soared by 65 times
over the past 30 years. Cyclones, droughts and floods threaten to
make life unviable on many islands long before rising seas swallow
them up.
Over the next century, global surface temperatures are projected
to climb at a rate without precedent in the last 10,000 years. Sea
levels are projected to rise between 9 and 88 centimetres. According
to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), there
is new and stronger evidence that most of the warming observed over
the last 50 years is attributable to human activities.
Sea-level rise is already eroding coastlines, where critical infrastructure
and populations are most concentrated. Coastal flooding is inundating
farmland and fresh water supplies with salt, forcing some islanders
to consider abandoning their homes forever. In the Marshall Islands,
farmers are resorting to growing crops in old oil drums to avoid
planting in saline soils. On the Carteret atolls, off Papua New
Guinea, rising seas have cut one island in half and left 1,500 people
dependent on food aid from the mainland.
Meanwhile, higher sea temperatures are threatening to kill off coral
reefs, which attract tourists, maintain natural sea defences, supply
beach sand and provide habitats for marine life essential to the
local diet. According to the IPCC, the thermal tolerance of
reef-building corals will be exceeded within the next few decades.
Climate change will trigger more intense, frequent and unpredictable
hazards. Across Oceania, while reported disasters have remained
constant between the 1970s and 1990s, their impacts are getting
far worse. Droughts and extreme temperatures affected 71,000 people
during the 1970s and 1980s, but over 13 million people in the 1990s.
Cyclones affected 18 times more people in the 1990s than in the
1970s, while floods and landslides affected nine times more. Either
disasters are becoming more extreme, or people are less well protected
than before.
Research by Commonwealth scientists suggests that under climate
change, there is likely to be a more El Niño-like mean state
over the Pacific. This will further increase the threat of
cyclones and drought. During the 1982-83 El Niño, rainfall
across the western Pacific was 70-90 per cent below average. Changes
in temperature and rainfall are also encouraging diseases such as
dengue fever and malaria. Pacific island nations share common vulnerabilities
which hamper their ability to adapt to climate change: small size
and (often) low elevation; wide distribution and remoteness; proneness
to natural disasters; rapid urbanization; increasing environmental
degradation; limited natural, human and financial resources; loss
of traditional coping mechanisms; and export-dependent economies.
Existing adaptation options may be unfeasible. Structural protection
for coastlines (e.g. breakwaters and beach nourishment using shipped-in
sand) is expensive. The alternative is to abandon shorelines
managed retreat. But for the lowest-lying Pacific atolls,
there is nowhere to retreat to. Most critical infrastructure is
within 100 metres of the coast. Replanting protective coastal mangroves
is a cheaper alternative. Other adaptation measures must include:
early warning for cyclones and droughts; water management and rationing;
rainwater harvesting; preventive health care and education to combat
diseases.
Initiatives at various levels are under way to combat climate change-related
risks. But more resources and political urgency are needed. Progress
in reducing greenhouse gas emissions is slow. Costs of adaptation
are unknown guesses range from tens to hundreds of billions
of dollars per year worldwide. Last year, however, rich countries
pledged to provide just US$ 0.4 billion per year by 2005 to help
developing countries adapt to climate change. By contrast, industrialized
nations spend US$ 70-80 billion per year on energy subsidies, including
for fossil fuels.
During the 1990s, a UN disaster reduction programme established
national disaster management offices and plans across the region.
But the offices are often understaffed and fail to consult with
disaster-prone communities. National disaster plans are often unworkable
since they are not written by local people, nor backed up by sufficient
budgets.
Since governmental assistance concentrates on disaster response,
people usually have to prepare for disasters on their own. And for
remoter islands, relief may take days to arrive. So community-based
disaster mitigation and preparedness will prove a vital survival
strategy.
The Red Cross emphasizes community-based self-reliance (CBSR). Villagers
are taught to assess their own vulnerabilities and capacities. They
are encouraged to draw maps of their local community, identifying
vulnerable locations (e.g., houses on steep slopes, deep water lagoons)
and vulnerable people (for example,. the elderly and disabled).
They also map resources such as strong buildings to use as evacuation
centres. Islanders are trained to set up disaster preparedness committees
and plans, and receive first-aid training.
Indigenous coping strategies are crucial in promoting disaster resilience.
Before cyclones hit, islanders instinctively prepare containers
of food and water, cut down overhanging branches, erect windbreaks
and lash their houses to trees. One non-governmental organization
in Fiji communicates preparedness messages through community theatre
a method rooted in the way that islanders learn their history,
through songs, dance, rituals and legends handed down from one generation
to the next.
Tuvalus environment officer fears that the shift to
a modern western lifestyle is making people more vulnerable to the
climate. They have lost their ways of coping and managing.
He adds: Both climate change and development are killing the
island.
As populations increase, the lack of decent land and housing has
led to more squatter settlements. New homes are being built on plots
exposed to flooding and landslides. Local development priorities
can be risk-blind. For example, Tuvalu recently spent
US$ 3 million (one-third of its annual budget) on a road-building
programme, but only US$ 107,000 on new homes, despite a housing
shortage.
Over-dependence on a few key exports is risky. Tourism and cash-crops
can account for 50-75 per cent of all foreign exchange earned by
Pacific islands. Yet these industries are seriously threatened by
fluctuations in global markets and weather. Cultivating hardy local
crops such as taro, yam and sweet potato may prove essential.
The threats posed by global warming to the people and economies
of Pacific islands are varied and far-reaching. A new development
paradigm is needed. Every policy decision must pass the acid test
of whether it increases or decreases vulnerability to climate change.
Communities at risk must be at the centre of development planning
if it is to succeed. Urgent priorities include:
- accelerating Global assessment of the
costs of adaptation to climate change in poor countries.
- New funds from rich countries for poor-country
adaptation, equal to the value of the subsidies given by rich
countries to domestic fossil fuel industries.
- Development models based on risk reduction,
incorporating indigenous coping strategies.
- Disaster awareness campaigns with materials
available in local languages.
- Coordinated plans for relocating threatened
communities with appropriate political, legal and financial resources.
process.
|
Relocation
the last resort
On 5 March 2002, the prime minister
of Tuvalu, Koloa Talake, announced that he was planning to sue
the worlds worst greenhouse gas polluters at the International
Court of Justice. He stressed that global warming was an issue
threatening both his people and country. It is frightening,
said Talake, islands that used to be our playgrounds have
disappeared. Some scientists say there is no rise in sea level,
but the tide is rising. We have seen it with our own eyes.
Last year, Tuvalus government attracted the worlds
attention by declaring it would start evacuating its citizens
in the face of climate change and rising sea levels. When Australia
rejected their proposal for special immigration status, Tuvalu
negotiated a deal with New Zealand whereby a number of its citizens
would be accepted each year, effectively as environmental
refugees.
It is easy for urban-dwelling people in developed countries
to underestimate the importance of land to Pacific islanders,
and hence the deep personal and cultural significance of its
loss. One woman from Kiribati explains: We cant
just move to another country. I would love to go to Fiji. But
there I have no land. There I am no one.
The spectre of wholesale relocation raises challenging questions.
Once land has been lost, will a residual nationality persist,
or does there need to be a new category of world citizen?
What legal status do environmental refugees have? What happens
to an abandoned countrys exclusive economic zone, its
territorial waters and nationhood? |
Andrew Simms, policy director at the
New Economics Foundation, and an advisor and writer on environment,
development and globalization issues, was principal contributor
to this chapter and box.
|
 |
 |
|