| |
| Integrating
relief, rehabilitation and development policy |
Introduction |
| Practical
experience of the National Societies, supported by research, provides
strong evidence that relief should take into account the long-term
implications of emergency assistance on rehabilitation, recovery
and development. On the other hand, development planning must identify
disaster risks. If these mutually complementary approaches are not
used, then opportunities to reduce or mitigate the impact of disasters
on communities and to strengthen National Societies' disaster preparedness
capacities are lost. Aid programming which restores the pre-disaster
status quo may inadvertently perpetuate vulnerability. There is
a clear need to look for ways to integrate relief, rehabilitation
and development.
The International Federation is an important
actor in the response to and rehabilitation after natural disasters.
The Federation is also frequently involved in rehabilitation or
recovery following armed conflict. Each type of disaster whether
droughts, floods, earthquakes, civil disturbances, industrial accidents
or other offers different opportunities to link and integrate response,
rehabilitation and development. Interaction of relief, rehabilitation
and development requires an analysis of the broader political, social
and economic context. In structural crises for instance, the response
to immediate needs has to appreciate the risk of creating social
or economic distortions. In a protracted disaster there may be a
need to rehabilitate the livelihoods of households and communities
also during the ongoing emergency. Root causes need to be identified
and exposed. The most important element to ensure that both short-term
and longer-term needs are addressed is to support the capacity of
the National Society to work with vulnerable communities.
|
| Scope |
| This
policy adds value to the existing policy framework of the International
Federation on relief, rehabilitation, disaster preparedness and development
and the various sector policies. It outlines the basis for linking
or integrating these different policy areas and applies to activities
at local, national, regional and international levels. It aims to
increase the effectiveness of International Federation action as a
whole with the ultimate goal to reduce vulnerability. |
| Statement |
| The
International Federation and each individual National Society shall:
- Change attitudes that treat relief and development
as isolated activities. Relief should always consider
the medium- and long-term needs of beneficiaries and seek to
increase the capacities of communities in disaster-prone areas.
Relief should lay the foundation to rehabilitate livelihoods
in such a way that they emerge as more resistant to shocks in
the future.
- Emphasise that the integrated planning and programming
of relief, rehabilitation and development activities and services
require close consultation with the people affected at the community
level and other service providers. National Society branches
should act as the main facilitator in this process.
- Use relief as an opportunity to enhance local capacities.
Identify and build upon coping mechanisms, use local material
and resources and take measures that regenerate livelihoods
and local economies. There is a need to adapt programming to
the socio-economic, cultural and environmental context as well
as to understand gender-related needs. Employ participatory
methodologies in assessment and programming.
- Ensure that relief does not inadvertently reinforce
tension or conflict within or between communities.
In unstable and post-conflict situations design programmes that
contribute to co-operation and reconciliation by building upon
shared needs and common beliefs.
- Incorporate recovery indicators into relief operations
to allow for smooth and timely shifts between relief
and rehabilitation.
- Recognize the need for inclusive disaster planning
of the National Society to be based upon an assessment
of vulnerabilities and capacities, a prioritization of the most
disaster-prone areas, and a recognized and clear role in the
overall disaster management of the country. Such planning will
ease the transition between relief, rehabilitation and development
and facilitate risk reduction in the future.
- Use disaster preparedness programmes as an essential
link between relief, rehabilitation and development
that build capacities at the community level as well as in the
National Society to better cope with future disasters, reduce
vulnerability and thus enhance development prospects.
- Underline that the National Society is the key
to link relief, rehabilitation and development and that the
International Federation should seek to back up the National
Society in this role. Regional and country strategies need to
provide orientation for participating partners on how to support
the capacity building of National Societies along integrated
lines.
- Contribute towards more systematic coordination,
improved working methods for joint assessments and planning
and the exchange of data and information between all actors
in the international aid community.
- Underline the importance of humanitarian advocacy
to promote solutions to root causes and ensure better linkages
between relief, rehabilitation and development. Ensure that
donor funding budget lines reflect that understanding.
|
|
| Reponsabilities |
| National
Societies and the International Federation have a responsibility to
ensure that all activities and programmes are carried out in compliance
with this policy; that all staff and volunteers are aware of the rationale
and content, and that all relevant governmental, intergovernmental
and non-governmental partners are adequately informed about it. |
|
| Further
reference texts |
|
| Reference:
This policy, approved by the XIIIth General Assembly of the International
Federation of the Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies. |
|
| Printed
version |
English
version
(80kb, 2 pages)
French
version
(85kb, 2 pages)
Arabic
version
(452kb, 2 páginas) |
|
|