Op-Ed: The weight of an emblem that no longer shields
The weight of an emblem that no longer shieldsByXavier Castellanos Mosquera, Under Secretary General for National Society Development and Coordination with The International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies (IFRC)The Red Cross and Red Crescent emblems are meant to signal neutrality, humanity, and protection. When they are not respected, the consequences are profound, not just for those who wear them, but for all of those in need.I have just returned from successive missions to Iran Lebanon, Syria, Jordan. What has stayed with me most is not only the scale of needs, it is the conditions and the psychological strain under which our volunteers are working.Weeks of intense hostilities in Iran and Lebanon have left health facilities, businesses and schools across both countries damaged or destroyed. Entire communities are struggling to access basic services, and the long-term consequences are only beginning to unfold. Millions are displaced.Amid this devastation, the reach and capability of our National Societies is extraordinary. In Iran, teams from the Iranian Red Crescent Society spoke of how their experience responding to floods and earthquakes has shaped their ability to carry out search and rescue in bombed neighbourhoods, pulling survivors from rubbles, often within minutes of an attack.I met a rescue team that had just lost a colleague in a so-called “double-tap” strike, where a second attack hits the same site as rescuers arrive. Five others were injured. They spoke calmly, professionally. But the weight of what they had experienced was unmistakable.In Lebanon, this is felt just as sharply.In Beirut, Tyre and Saida, I met volunteers from the Lebanese Red Cross working around the clock in a deepening humanitarian crisis. I was struck watching teams prepare to respond to strikes, putting on heavy flak jackets and helmets before getting into ambulances.You cannot help but ask: what must it be like to perform CPR (Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation) under that weight? To try to save a life while fearing for your own is something no one should have to bear.I saw how volunteers embrace each other before they leave their compound. They do so out of a genuine affection for each other, but also in the knowledge they may never return. Some have even endured strikes inside their own compounds. During our short visit to Tyre, there were three strikes in the surrounding area. We watched colleagues head out towards the danger, knowing the risks, and going anyway.This is the impossible weight our volunteers now carry. Some of them are displaced living in shelters and supporting in health care, mental health, protection and community engagement.Sadly, this is not an isolated reality. It reflects a broader and deeply alarming trend. In the first five months of 2026, 18 volunteers and staff from National Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies have already lost their lives, nine in violent attacks. This includes six of our colleagues from Iran and Lebanon that have been killed while simply trying to protect and save others.Our emblems must mean something again. Because without them, when those who save lives are no longer safe, the consequences will be felt by us all.